|
On 25 December 1084, at the Battle of Piedra Pisada, the Taifa of Zaragoza fought and probably defeated the Kingdom of Aragon on the road south from Naval to El Grado. The battle was a minor engagement of the ongoing ''Reconquista'' of Aragon, the process by which the riverine valleys of the southern slopes of the Pyrenees were gradually conquered and returned, after centuries of Muslim rule, to the control of Christian princes. The ruler of Aragon, who personally led his men in battle at Piedra Pisada, Sancho Ramírez, also ruled Kingdom of Navarre and was a major figure in the contemporary ''Reconquista''.〔Antonio Ubieto Arteta, (“La batalla de «Piedra-Pisada»” ), ''Argensola: Revista de Ciencias Sociales del Instituto de Estudios Altoaragoneses'' 1952 11 253–56.〕 The battle is only recorded in two later sources, the Aragonese and Latin versions of the ''Chronicle of San Juan de la Peña''. The former says that "in the year of our Lord 1083 ... (Ramírez ) did battle in ''Piedra-pissada'' with the Moors on Christmas day."〔''en el año de neustro Senyor M. LXXXIII ... fizo batalla en Piedra-pissada con los moros el dia de nadal'', from the edition of Ximénez de Embún (Zaragoza, 1876), 52.〕 The Latin translation reads: "And () made battle before ''Petram Pisadam'' with the Moors, the day of the Nativity in the year of our Lord 1084."〔''et preliatus fuit apud Petram Pisadam cum mauris, die nativitatis anno MLXXXIIII Domini'', from the edition of Ximénez de Embún (Zaragoza, 1876), 52.〕 The two texts differ in the year, and neither specifies the winner of the engagement. The location of ''Petra Pisata'' was long thought to be Piedratajada, but this is unlikely on linguistic grounds.〔Piedra Pisada, Piedra Pesada, Piedra Pisa and Piedra Pesa are the expected forms in Romance, derived from the Latin by the sonorisation of the intervocalic ''t'' and the loss of the ending ''-da''. As Ubieto Arteta shows, these are in fact the forms encountered in the medieval documents.〕 In a document nearly contemporary with the battle, Peter I of Aragon and Navarre, Sancho's son and successor, enumerated the parishes whose tithes belonged to the church of Santa María of Alquézar in geographic order from east to west, placing ''Petra Pisata'' between Naval and Salinas de Hoz.〔The parishes, all north of Barbastro and between the rivers Cinca and Alcanadre, listed in order are Naval, Suelves, ''Petra Pisata'', Salinas de Hoz, Alachestro, Cellas, Costean, Castillazuelo, Pozán de Vero, Adahuesca, Abiego, and Azlor. All of Peter's documents, authentic and spurious, are found in Ubieto Arteta, ''Colección diplomática de Pedro I de Aragón y Navarra'' (Zaragoza, 1951).〕 A forged document from the late twelfth or more likely the thirteenth century purportedly from October 1099 lists the same parishes owing tithes to Alquézar, but in a less orderly manner, naming among them ''Petra Piza''. In the thirteenth century, the name of the site had degenerated further to simply ''Pisa'',〔A document of Sancho Ramírez dated 29 October 1082, but which must date later than 1087, in a thirteenth-century copy names the villages within the ''terminus'' of the castle of Naval as ''Figarola, Torretella, Pisa, Lassosa''. A document of 1214 in the archives of the cathedral of Huesca refers to a field "by the way of Pisa" (''ad viam de Pisa'') near Naval.〕 which has been identified with the ''coto redondo de Pisa'', a collection of farms south of Naval. The ''Reconquista'' of the what are today the ''comarcas'' of Bajo Cinca, Cinca Medio, Ribagorza, Sobrarbe and Somontano de Barbastro was effected along two ancient routes, probably of Roman origin. One followed the river Ésera through the important town of Graus south to Monzón and the lower reaches of the river Cinca. East of the Cinca lay the other route, connecting Boltaña and Barbastro. The ''Reconquista'' of the Cinca valley and surrounding territory to its west was rapid. By 1049 Perarrúa was the most advanced position on the Ésera, held by a don Suniero, and by 1062 Laguarres was the most advanced position on the Isábena. Both faced the formidable city of Graus, which was unsuccessfully besieged as early as 1055 and again in 1063 with disastrous results, finally falling to the Christians on 14 April 1083.〔On 28 April Sancho Ramírez granted half the lordship of the castle of Ayerbe to the moanstery of San Juan de la Peña, and the charter's dating clause specifies it was "the fourteenth day after God gave Graus to me ()" (''quarta decima die postquam Deus dedit michi Gradus'').〕 By 1083 all lands north of the Sierra de Estada were in Aragonese hands.〔A charter of June 1083 was witnessed by one Bernardo Ramón de Castro, the earliest piece of evidence that Castro was by then the southernmost Christian ''tenencia'' (holding) in the Aragonese sector of the ''Reconquista''.〕 On the other side of the Cinca the town of Castejón de Sobrarbe fell in 1057 and that of Abizanda in 1059, but further progress was slower.〔A document dated 1054, but more probably from 1057, mentions one García Íñiguez as"lord ... in Castejón" (''senior Garsea Ennecones in Castillone'').〕 Naval, which was essential to the defence of Barbastro (which was briefly occupied in 1063–64), and Arguedas were not taken until 1084, and shortly lost to the Moors for a decade.〔The source is the ''Crónica navarro-aragonesa'': "And in the years of the Spanish era 1122 he () took Arguedas and Naval" (''E era 1122 prisso ad Arguedas e Nabal'').〕 Since Piedra Pisada (Pisa) lies on the road south from Naval, the Aragonese army would have had to bypass an important enemy fortification in order to fight there, unless Naval had already been taken. It is most likely therefore that the date of 1084 found in the Latin chronicle is correct.〔As concluded Jerónimo Zurita in the seventeenth century.〕 Since the loss of Naval posed a threat to Barbastro, it is likely that forces from the ''taifa'' were sent to retake it later in 1084 and that it was these forces which Sancho Ramírez met on the road south from Naval. Since neither surviving record of the battle, both Christian, records the outcome and Naval is known to have lapsed out of Christian control soon after its conquest, it is probable that the battle was a loss for Sancho.〔 In the aftermath of the defeat at Piedra Pisada, in 1085 Sancho invested his son Peter as king of Ribagorza and Sobrarbe under Aragonese suzerainty. Estada was conquered in July 1087, and Monzón with the aid of some defecting Muslims in 1089. In 1095 Peter accepted the surrender of the garrison of the castle Naval, and in October 1099 he made an accord with its Christian populators.〔 ==Notes== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Battle of Piedra Pisada」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|